DeepCFD (Deep Computational Fluid Dynamics)¶
# linux
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
# windows
# curl --create-dirs -o ./datasets/dataX.pkl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
# curl --create-dirs -o ./datasets/dataX.pkl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
python deepcfd.py
# linux
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
# windows
# curl --create-dirs -o ./datasets/dataX.pkl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
# curl --create-dirs -o ./datasets/dataX.pkl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
python deepcfd.py mode=eval EVAL.pretrained_model_path=https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/models/deepcfd/deepcfd_pretrained.pdparams
# linux
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
# windows
# curl --create-dirs -o ./datasets/dataX.pkl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
# curl --create-dirs -o ./datasets/dataX.pkl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
python deepcfd.py mode=infer
| Pretrained Model | Metrics |
|---|---|
| deepcfd_pretrained.pdparams | MSE.Total_MSE(mse_validator): 1.92947 MSE.Ux_MSE(mse_validator): 0.70684 MSE.Uy_MSE(mse_validator): 0.21337 MSE.p_MSE(mse_validator): 1.00926 |
1. Background Introduction¶
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation can obtain the distribution of various physical quantities of fluids, such as density, pressure and velocity, by solving the Navier-Stokes equations (N-S equations). It is widely used in fields such as microelectromechanical systems, civil engineering and aerospace.
In some complex application scenarios, such as wing optimization and fluid-structure interaction, tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of grids are needed to model the problem (as shown in the figure below, the figure shows the full-machine internal and external flow integrated structured grid model of the F-18 fighter), resulting in huge computational costs for CFD. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop a method that is more efficient than traditional CFD methods while maintaining computational accuracy.
2. Problem Definition¶
The Navier-Stokes equations are equations used to describe fluid motion. Their two-dimensional form is as follows,
Mass conservation:
Momentum conservation:
Where \(\bf{u}\) is the velocity field (with x and y dimensions), \(\rho\) is the density, \(p\) is the pressure field, and \(\bf{f}\) is the body force (such as gravity).
Assuming non-uniform steady-state fluid conditions are met, the time-dependent term can be removed from the equation, and \(\bf{u}\) can be decomposed into velocity components \(u_x\) and \(u_y\). The momentum equation can be rewritten as:
Where \(g\) represents gravitational acceleration and \(\nu\) represents the kinematic viscosity of the fluid.
3. Problem Solving¶
The above problem can usually be solved using OpenFOAM for traditional numerical methods, but the calculation amount is large. Next, we will explain how to solve this problem using deep learning methods based on PaddleScience code.
This case is solved based on the method of the paper Ribeiro M D, Rehman A, Ahmed S, et al. DeepCFD: Efficient steady-state laminar flow approximation with deep convolutional neural networks. For the theoretical part of this method, please refer to the original paper. In order to quickly understand PaddleScience, only key steps such as model construction, equation construction, and computational domain construction are described below, while other details please refer to API Documentation.
3.1 Dataset Introduction¶
The data in this dataset is obtained using OpenFOAM. The dataset has two files, dataX and dataY. dataX contains the input information of the geometric shapes of 981 channel flow samples, and dataY contains the corresponding OpenFOAM solution results.
Before running the code for this problem, please download dataX and dataY according to the command below:
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataX.pkl
wget -c -P ./datasets/ https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/DeepCFD/dataY.pkl
dataX and dataY both have the same dimensions (Ns, Nc, Nx, Ny), where the first axis is the number of samples (Ns), the second axis is the number of channels (Nc), and the third and fourth axes are the number of elements in x and y (Nx and Ny) respectively. In the input data dataX, the first channel is the SDF (Signed distance function) of the obstacle in the computational domain, the second channel is the label of the flow region, and the third channel is the SDF of the computational domain boundary. In the output data dataY, the first channel is the horizontal velocity component (Ux), the second channel is the vertical velocity component (Uy), and the third channel is the fluid pressure (p).
The original download address of the dataset is: https://zenodo.org/record/3666056/files/DeepCFD.zip?download=1
We divide the dataset into training set and validation set at a ratio of 7:3, the code is as follows:
3.2 Model Construction¶
In the above problem, we determine that the input is input and the output is output. According to the paper, we use the UNetEx network containing 3 encoders and decoders to create the model.
The input of the model contains the SDF (Signed distance function) of the obstacle, the label of the flow region and the SDF of the computational domain boundary. The output of the model contains the horizontal velocity component (Ux), the vertical velocity component (Uy) and the fluid pressure (p).
Model creation is expressed in PaddleScience code as follows:
3.3 Constraint Construction¶
This case solves the problem based on data-driven methods, so it is necessary to use SupervisedConstraint built in PaddleScience to construct supervised constraints. Before defining constraints, you need to first specify various parameters used for data loading in supervised constraints, the code is as follows:
The first parameter of SupervisedConstraint is the data loading method, here fill in the variable names of relevant data.
The second parameter is the definition of the loss function. Here, a custom loss function is used to calculate the mean square error of Ux and Uy, and the standard deviation of p, and then the weighted sum of the three.
The third parameter is the name of the constraint condition, which is convenient for subsequent indexing. Here it is named "sup_constraint".
After the supervised constraint is constructed, encapsulate it into a dictionary with the name we just named as the key for subsequent access.
| examples/deepcfd/deepcfd.py | |
|---|---|
3.4 Hyperparameter Setting¶
Next, you need to specify the number of training epochs in the configuration file. Here, based on experimental experience, we use one thousand training epochs.
| examples/deepcfd/conf/deepcfd.yaml | |
|---|---|
3.5 Optimizer Construction¶
The training process will call the optimizer to update model parameters. Here, the more commonly used Adam optimizer is selected, the learning rate is set to 0.001, and the weight decay is set to 0.005.
| examples/deepcfd/deepcfd.py | |
|---|---|
3.6 Validator Construction¶
Usually during the training process, the training status of the current model is evaluated using the validation set at a certain epoch interval. We use ppsci.validate.SupervisedValidator to construct the validator.
Evaluation metric metric here defines four indicators Total_MSE, Ux_MSE, Uy_MSE and p_MSE.
Other configurations are similar to the settings of Constraint Construction.
3.7 Model Training and Evaluation¶
After completing the above settings, you only need to pass the instantiated objects to ppsci.solver.Solver, and then start training and evaluation.
3.8 Result Visualization¶
Use matplotlib to plot the calculation results of OpenFOAM and DeepCFD with the same input parameters for comparison. Here, the calculation results of the 0th data of the validation set are plotted.
| examples/deepcfd/deepcfd.py | |
|---|---|
4. Complete Code¶
| examples/deepcfd/deepcfd.py | |
|---|---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 | |
5. Result Display¶
It can be seen that the DeepCFD method is basically consistent with the OpenFOAM results.
