PhyLSTM¶
# linux
wget -c https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/PhyLSTM/data_boucwen.mat
# windows
# curl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/PhyLSTM/data_boucwen.mat -o data_boucwen.mat
python phylstm2.py mode=eval EVAL.pretrained_model_path=https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/models/phylstm/phylstm2_pretrained.pdparams
# linux
wget -c https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/PhyLSTM/data_boucwen.mat
# windows
# curl https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/datasets/PhyLSTM/data_boucwen.mat -o data_boucwen.mat
python phylstm3.py mode=eval EVAL.pretrained_model_path=https://paddle-org.bj.bcebos.com/paddlescience/models/phylstm/phylstm3_pretrained.pdparams
| Pretrained Model | Metrics |
|---|---|
| phylstm2_pretrained.pdparams | loss(sup_valid): 0.00799 |
| phylstm3_pretrained.pdparams | loss(sup_valid): 0.03098 |
1. Background Introduction¶
We introduce an innovative physics-informed LSTM framework for metamodeling of nonlinear structural systems lacking data. The basic concept is to integrate available but incomplete physical knowledge (such as physical laws, scientific principles) into a deep Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, which restricts and facilitates learning within a feasible solution space. Physical constraints are embedded in the loss function to enforce model training to accurately capture potential system non-linearities even when available training datasets are very limited. Especially for dynamic structures, physical laws of equations of motion, state dependence, and hysteresis constitutive relationships are considered to construct physical losses. Embedded physics can alleviate overfitting problems, reduce the need for large training datasets, and improve the robustness of trained models, making them capable of extrapolation, thereby making more reliable predictions. Therefore, the physics-knowledge-guided deep learning paradigm outperforms traditional non-physics-guided data-driven neural networks.
2. Problem Definition¶
Metamodeling of structural systems aims to develop low-fidelity (or low-order) models to effectively capture potential nonlinear input-output behaviors. Metamodels can be trained on datasets obtained from high-fidelity simulations or actual system sensing. To illustrate better, we consider a building-type structure and assume that seismic dynamics are governed by low-fidelity nonlinear equations of motion (EOM):
Where M is the mass matrix; C is the damping matrix; K is the stiffness matrix.
The governing equation can be rewritten in a more general form:
3. Problem Solving¶
Next, we will explain how to convert the problem into PaddleScience code step by step and solve the problem using deep learning methods. In order to quickly understand PaddleScience, only key steps such as model construction, equation construction, and computational domain construction are described below, while other details please refer to API Documentation.
3.1 Model Construction¶
In the PhyLSTM problem, establish an LSTM network Deep LSTM network, expressed in PaddleScience code as follows
DeepPhyLSTM parameters input_size is input size, output_size is output size, hidden_size is hidden layer size, model_type is model type.
3.2 Data Construction¶
Before running the code for this problem, please download data_boucwen.mat according to the following command.
This case involves reading data construction, as shown below
3.3 Constraint Construction¶
Set training dataset and loss calculation function, return fields, code is as follows:
3.4 Validator Construction¶
Set evaluation dataset and loss calculation function, return fields, code is as follows:
3.5 Hyperparameter Setting¶
Next, we need to specify the number of training epochs. Here we use 100 training epochs based on experimental experience.
3.6 Optimizer Construction¶
The training process will call the optimizer to update model parameters. Here, the Adam optimizer is selected and learning_rate is set to 1e-3.
3.7 Model Training and Evaluation¶
After completing the above settings, you only need to pass the instantiated objects to ppsci.solver.Solver in order.
Finally, start training and evaluation:
4. Complete Code¶
| phylstm2.py | |
|---|---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 | |
| phylstm3.py | |
|---|---|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 | |
5. Result Display¶
The PhyLSTM2 case was experimented with the parameter configuration of epoch=100 and learning_rate=1e-3, and the result returned Loss was 0.00799.
The PhyLSTM3 case was experimented with the parameter configuration of epoch=200 and learning_rate=1e-3, and the result returned Loss was 0.03098.